Wednesday, March 12, 2008

Once Again, Back To "Project Apollo", Proven Fakery

I have done many articles in showing that Project Apollo was a massive scam on the world. I figure it is time to repeat some of the proofs that the whole project was an elaborate hoax.

We were led to believe that between 1968-1972, 9 flimsy aluminum skinned spacecraft carrying 3 astronauts each went safely to the moon and back to Earth, and in 6 of the missions actually landed men on the lunar surface. This is the official NASA story line.

We have been led to believe that these thin aluminum skinned spacecraft went all that way, surviving constant bombardment by cosmic and solar radiation, and micrometeorites. We also have been led to believe that each Apollo mission sustained absolutely no adverse affects by the radiation, or sustained absolutely no hits by these same micrometeorites. These "facts" are indeed remarkable, taking into account that the space between the earth and the moon is a vacuum, with no atmosphere to prevent either space rocks or radiation from hitting the Apollo spacecraft! Micrometeorites travel at many thousands of miles per hour, and with no atmosphere or strong shielded hull of a spacecraft to stop them, one hit by only a pebble sized rock would have easily destroyed any Apollo spacecraft!

We have also been led to believe that these craft travelled through thousands of miles of the Van Allen Radiation Belts. These belts encircle the earth starting at about 500 miles up, and the radiation levels alone during a transit of these belts would be enough to either fry the astronauts, give them radiation poisoning, or cancer! People must understand that these Apollo spacecraft were built as flimsily as possible just to make the weight restrictions in getting them off the ground, and had almost no shielding from space radiation! Aluminum barely stops any radiation at all, and considering how paper thin walls of each Apollo spacecraft were, I am truly amazed that any of these astronauts "volunteered" for these missions knowing it could be suicide!

We were led to believe that the Apollo spacecraft made this journey with enough internal battery power to prevent the interior of the craft from heating up to 250 degrees fahrenheit during each mission for 5-7 days! THIS fact is something that NASA does not want the public to have full knowledge of... The problem with outer space is not COLD but HEAT.... With absolutely no earth shadow to block solar radiation from hitting the spacecraft during the journey, the interior of the spacecraft will have nowhere to dissipate the buildup of heat within the craft, except by the use of air conditioning. Without air conditioning, the interior will within a short time heat up to about 250 degrees fahrenheit! NASA has had the public believing that each craft would survive for 7 days using batteries only to power enough air conditioning to keep the interior of the craft, including the LEM on the lunar surface cooled! Take the time to look at the video "Moonfaker Exhibit C" to see Ralph Rene's article on Heat in outer space, and the proof from what happened to Skylab in earth orbit, where that craft sustained massive interior overheating due to failure of its sun shading!

I am also truly amazed that people still believe that there are no stars visible in outer space, especially on the moon. The pilot of Spaceship One, the first private flight to outer space back in 2004, reported that he saw the sky totally loaded with stars! Read the report for yourselves if you need proof. All of the Apollo astronauts never talk about the stars. The reason is obvious... If they ever had attempted to reproduce stars in the studio where the fakery was done, some amateur astronomers would have easily discovered, and blown the whistle on the entire sham. The astronauts were told to never talk about the stars as a result, and to lie to the public and say that stars could not be seen on the moon, due to either solar glare, earth glare, or moon glare. It is also remarkable about how the Space Shuttle astronauts, and those astronauts on the International Space Station are also told to never discuss stars in any of their observations. NASA has to perpetuate the lie, or the whole sham would be exposed.

Other factors come into play that are worth mentioning.... The LEM was too small for the two supposed astronauts to move around in, or even to get out of! Look at Jim Collier's expose on the LEM in his video "Was It Only A Paper Moon?" for more information. The landing of the LEM on the moon was faked due to the simple facts that the retrorocket left absolutely no crater, and the rocket itself powered by hydrazine hypergolic fuel didnt eject a red opaque flame, or smoke during either its landing, or liftoff from the moon! There is also no dispersion of lunar soil under the LEM from its landing on the surface! With almost 2500lbs of thrust in lunar gravity, it should have blown all the soil and rocks away from right below the lander.....NASA definitely blew it here.... How could Neil Armstrong have left that initial footprint on the lunar surface if in reality the lander had blown all that soil away?

There is also the so called Lunar Rover, which in alot of photos from the moon shows absolutely no tracks to and from where it is in each picture... The question being.... How did the rover get to its position in each photo without wheel tracks? It appears that they lowered the rover by crane for these photo shoots! Look at Jack White's photo expose closely in aulis.com for more information.

Then there is the evidence of shadow divergence in almost all Apollo photographs. On the moon, due to weight restrictions, the astronauts didnt bring any additional lighting with them. Therefore, the only lighting on the moon was the light from the sun, and reflected lighting from the lunar surface, and earth shine. With the sun as the primary and most significant light source, all shadows should have stayed almost parallel. However, we find shadows angling off in different directions, or diverging. This can only be due to a SECONDARY lighting source, and therefore blows the whistle on the whole sham. Apollo-gists stick to the idea that the secondary light is from reflected light off of the moon, or earth shine, but most photo experts dismiss this as not possible. We are there left with the useage of artificial studio lighting as the only explanation!

There is so much information to cover about this elaborate scam. Needless to say, billions of people were fooled by this massive hoax, and criminals got rich off of it. People need to understand that they have been lied to about Project Apollo, and that is not easy. It is human nature to want to strongly have faith, and to believe. When they are given evidence of their beliefs to be lies, they become angry, and fight hard to rationalize the lies as being true. We only need to look at how our history has been nothing but a pack of lies to see how Apollo is only one more in the mix.

Project Apollo is only one of the many lies of history. Some lies are so hard to believe that criminals have passed laws to prevent proper research from exposing the truth. Apollo is still one that can be researched, and I do strongly urge all of my readers to do so. Do not dismiss real facts by shooting the messengers, for there are a lot of fools out there doing just that, and they fall into the category of fighting hard to rationalize the lies as being true.

Remember to be a truth seeker yourselves!



No comments: