It has been a while since I put up any article from Christopher Bollyn, and for this entry in my own blog, the following article is indeed dynamite! I want to present the following article from Christopher Bollyn, (www.bollyn.com) entitled: "Who Destroyed The 9-11 Evidence?" right here in its entirety. The facts presented speak for themselves:
Who Destroyed the 9/11 Evidence?
On Saturday, December 18, I discussed my research about the destruction of the steel of the World Trade Center with Kevin Barrett on his radio show. The following day, a blogger called "Gretavo" posted the following comment on his website, WTCDemolition.com:
Submitted by gretavo on Sun, 2010-12-19 11:21.
Christopher Bollyn re-appears with very convoluted series of connections that he claims prove a Mossad connection to the destruction of steel. And also to "military applications of thin coatings" -- as if painted on nanothermite were conclusively proven to have been used.
Gustavo A. Espada, a.k.a. "Gretavo Verdadero", has written on Kevin Barrett's site mujca.com in support of Academic Freedom.
If I remember clearly, Gustavo Espada was raised in US Embassies in Columbia, Brazil and Nicaragua where he had much contact with and was protected by the CIA.
I also seem to remember Gustavo Espada filming activists in Cambridge, MA and providing the film to the very operation the article is about: KOBE. That film was used to harass activists, including DeVoy.
Gustavo Espada's father currently works in the US Embassy in Nicaragua (Consul General). Evidence supports the belief that he works for the CIA undercover at Harvard University."
Avner Azulay of the Mossad...
manages the Marc Rich foundations
On 19 November 2010 I sent photographs of Jehuda Saar and Nathan Fruchter, two orthodox Zionist Belgian Jews and two of the main people involved in the Mossad "recycling" of the 300,000 tons of steel from the World Trade Center, to Roy Tov, the Christian Israeli author of The Cross of Bethlehem.
Jehuda Saar taking out the garbage before he moved to Israel from Teaneck, New Jersey in 2006. Saar "trashed" 300,000 tons of steel from the World Trade Center for the Mossad...
along with his Israeli-Belgian buddy, Nathan K. Fruchter.
If the pictures are real, then there is little doubt regarding their allies and employers. The chances they'll answer in such case are slim, or it will be in the form of an attack (lawyers or violent) against you.
Daniel Strechay is the corporate gatekeeper who speaks for the company who profited from the illegal destruction of the steel evidence from the World Trade Center.
He then said that the company is very proud of how it handled the steel from the Twin Towers, but was adamant in his refusal to let me speak with any of the men who were actually involved in the operation, and hung up the phone. Later, I got through to Alan Ratner by email and he wrote back, so I sent him a few questions, but he has yet to respond. Clearly, these men do not want to discuss their roles in the destruction of the steel from the World Trade Center.
Kenneth Holden - Mayor Bloomberg's "Unsung Hero" of the 9/11 Clean-Up
I thought for a minute and called Holden right back. He picked up the phone and I immediately asked, "Was it Chertoff? Was it Michael Chertoff who gave you the verbal permission?" Holden was silent on the other end of the line, then he ended the call as he had done before.
"Silence is agreement" is an old Estonian saying that comes to mind. The logic is that Holden could not deny that Chertoff had given him the verbal permission, so he remained silent. Common sense would suggest that the permission must have come from Chertoff, who as Assistant Attorney General of the United States was the top dog responsible for the federal (FBI) investigation of 9/11.
Assistant Attorney General Michael Chertoff was "top dog" at the FBI during the "non-investigation" of 9/11, in which the crucial steel evidence was destroyed in Asian smelters before being examined by engineers. Chertoff's Israeli mother, Livia Eisen, was one of the first Mossad agents. An Israeli by birth, Michael spent much of his childhood in Israel.
The towers were well built structures that used more steel than today's skyscrapers. The debris contained about 300,000 tons of steel that was hastily dispatched by a New York City official to two Zionist-controlled scrapyards in New Jersey - before it could even be inspected by engineers. These Jewish-owned scrapyards then shipped the steel - hard evidence from the crime scene - to Asian smelters where it was melted down far from the prying eyes of U.S. investigators. Why was this allowed and who was behind it?
Thomas Wornom, Bureau Chief, Special Prosecutions Bureau
Over the last three weeks you have been informed about the overwhelming evidence that World Trade Center Building 7 was demolished with explosives. I trust that you understand the serious implications of this crime and that you are resolved to prosecute the guilty parties. To provide a critical steppingstone in your investigation, I would like to bring to your attention the widely documented – and widely protested – destruction of physical evidence (structural steel) at the crime scene, which I contend is prosecutable pursuant to Article 205 of the New York Penal Code, § 205.50 Hindering Prosecution.
“[A] person ‘renders criminal assistance’ when, with intent to prevent, hinder or delay the discovery or apprehension of…a person he knows or believes has committed a crime…he...suppresses, by any act of concealment, alteration or destruction, any physical evidence which might aid in the discovery or apprehension of such person or in the lodging of a criminal charge against him;”
I will present publicly available information on the destruction of physical evidence from the World Trade Center site, below my signature, in four sections entitled:
1. Official acknowledgement of the destruction of physical evidence from the WTC.
2. Control of the WTC cleanup.
3. The decision to destroy the physical evidence.
4. The continued destruction of evidence despite public outcry
- Committee on Science, U.S. House of Representatives, March 6, 2002
“[T]here is so much that has been lost in these last six months that we can never go back and retrieve. And that is not only unfortunate, it is borderline criminal.”
- Joseph Crowley, U.S. Congressman, 7th District, New York
“[O]n September 28, the New York Times learned that the city was recycling the steel. When the Times contacted Kenneth R. Holden, commissioner of the Department of Design and Construction, he said that no one from the investigative team had asked him to keep or inspect the steel. The ASCE, it turned out, had faxed a request, but to the wrong fax machine. Late that afternoon, after reporters shuttled the correct fax number to the ASCE, Holden said that a request had finally reached him."
Of course, Mayor Giuliani – previously a U.S. Attorney – and the DDC had to be fully aware of the illegality of destroying the physical evidence prior to their decision to recycle the steel. Their refusal to desist from recycling the steel when asked by the investigative team to do so – still less than three weeks into the cleanup effort, with hundreds of thousands of tons of steel still salvageable, and relatively negligible revenue from selling the steel not an issue because there was virtually unlimited federal funding for the cleanup effort – strongly suggests their contravention of the law was deliberate and motivated by intent to prevent the discovery of a crime they knew had taken place...
Calls to halt the recycling fell on deaf ears. According to Times reporters Glanz and Lipton:
“Officials in the mayor's office declined to reply to written and oral requests for comment over a three-day period about who decided to recycle the steel and the concern that the decision might be handicapping the investigation. ‘The city considered it reasonable to have recovered structural steel recycled,’ said Matthew G. Monahan, a spokesman for the city's Department of Design and Construction, which is in charge of debris removal at the site”
Why didn’t the city simply stop recycling the steel? Again, the outright refusal of city officials to desist from recycling the steel strongly suggests their contravention of the law was deliberate and motivated by intent to prevent the discovery of a crime they knew had taken place.
Radio Show on Destruction of 9/11 Steel
or through this link to the archived show:
Dear Mr. Bollyn,
Thank you for your excellent work and research on 9/11. It's hard to imagine such evil snakes remain at large and unpunished for these crimes. My nephew, (name withheld), worked in the south tower, and was murdered that day. No amount of money would give me the satisfaction of beheading these criminals with an axe!
NTS Notes: The answer to the question is obvious. The evil Israeli Mossad worked closely with its Sayanim and other agents in America to make sure that the metal from the Twin Tower destruction was quickly disposed of, quite obviously to prevent any investigation discovering the truth that the towers were felled by explosives!
It is truly sickening to see that these criminals, including Michael Chertoff, have gotten away with this mass murder of American citizens, and the US Government has done absolutely nothing to this date in terms of having them arrested for murder, or interfering with the crime scene. Rapidly removing the 300000 tons of metal from the twin towers and then having the audacity in selling the metal as scrap to China shows the outright boldness of these murderers!
The time will come when America finally awakens to the truth about who did the attacks of 9-11, and when that time comes, a sleeping angry giant will be finally awakened.... That time truly cannot come soon enough.
More to come